An Online Community
AlbumAlbum   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of the webmasters, administrators and moderators of this forum. Refer to the complete disclaimer.
From burkinis to the Koran: Why Islam isn't like other faith

Post new topic   Reply to topic    AVENUE VIET Forum Index » L'Avenue
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Joined: 30 Apr 2005
Posts: 2371
Location: L.A., California

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 11:04 pm    Post subject: From burkinis to the Koran: Why Islam isn't like other faith Reply with quote


Los Angeles Times
Why Islam isn't like other faiths
By Shadi Hamid
September 9, 2016

My parents, brother and I were on vacation in Florida, and we were talking
about Donald Trump. The idea of leaving America if a scary Republican wins
has always been a joke among high-minded liberals who can just fly off and
find a job in Toronto or Geneva. But for my family, the joke had taken on
a more sinister tone.

It was the Muslim version of “the talk,” and it went something like
this: If, God forbid, it gets worse and a President Trump encourages a
climate of hatred and persecution against American Muslims, then what are
our options? Trump, after all, has expressed support for registering
Muslims in a database and refused to disavow Franklin D. Roosevelt’s
internment of Japanese Americans, so it wasn’t too much of a stretch.

My dad was born and raised in authoritarian Egypt, later immigrating to
Canada and then the United States.

To my surprise, he is still technically a Canadian citizen. We had a
backup plan! As we played out the various frightening scenarios, my
parents, after flirting with the idea of self-imposed exile, reached the
same conclusion: This is their country too, and they would fight for it.
They wouldn’t give up.

It’s possible to be both fully Muslim and fully American — right-wing
noise to the contrary.

It was an inspiring thing to watch, and a reminder that it’s possible to
be both fully Muslim and fully American — right-wing noise to the
contrary. One 2016 survey actually found that “Muslims who say their
faith is important to their identity are more likely to say being American
is important to how they think of themselves.”

Still, I understand why many Americans might find Islam puzzling and
foreign. There’s no contradiction in the term American Muslim; but that
doesn’t mean Islam is like other monotheistic faiths. It isn’t, in
part because it doesn’t lend itself as easily to modern liberalism. The
more I’ve studied my own religion — its theology, history and culture
— the more I’ve come to appreciate how complicated it is and how much
more complicated it must be for people who are coming at it from scratch.

Contrary to what many think, there is no Christian equivalent to Koranic
“inerrancy,” even among far-right evangelicals. Muslims believe the
Koran is not only God’s word, but God’s actual speech — in other
words, every single letter and word in the Koran comes directly from God.
This seemingly semantic difference has profound implications. If the Koran
is God’s speech, and God is unchanging and perfect, then so is his
speech. To question the divine origin of the Koran, then, is to question
God himself, and God is not easily put in a box, well away from the public

Differences between Christianity and Islam also are evident in each
faith’s central figure. Unlike Jesus, who was a dissident, Muhammad was
both prophet and politician. And more than just any politician, he was a
state-builder as well as a head of state. Not only were the religious and
political functions intertwined in the person of Muhammad, they were meant
to be intertwined. To argue for the separation of religion from politics,
then, is to argue against the model of the very man Muslims most admire
and seek to emulate.

Islam’s outsized role in public life leads, circuitously, all the way to
the “burkini” controversy. Westerners might ask themselves: Is it
really that big of a deal if a few French mayors ask women to wear a
“normal” swimsuit on the beach? Well, yes.

If you’re a Muslim woman who wears the hijab — covering the hair and
most of the body — you can’t wear just any swimsuit. Some women, of
course, are pressured or even legally mandated to wear the hijab (as in
Saudi Arabia and Iran), but most choose to do so; it’s about their
personal relationship with God. Regardless of whether we like it, the
predominant scholarly opinion today is that wearing hijab is fard, or
obligatory. Although Western feminists may argue that covering up is
sexist — it can encourage the idea that women are primarily sexual
objects — asking Muslim women to take off the hijab is akin to asking
them to violate their connection with the creator.

There are dress codes in Judaism too, of course, but it is only a
relatively small number of ultraorthodox women who observe them. The
hijab, by contrast, is ubiquitous in Muslim communities, and in some
Muslim countries, such as Egypt and Jordan, the majority of Muslim women
cover their hair. Again, this is often a conscious choice: Many Muslims
take their religion so seriously that they want to observe seemingly
restrictive and pre-modern dress codes. This is the case even in Turkey,
where millions of women cover their hair despite decades of secular
government and forced unveiling in state institutions.

This fact gets at something deeper, which often goes unsaid because it
suggests there is — or at least there may be — a clash of cultures.
Islam seems, at least by Western standards, unusually assertive and
uncompromising. Critics might see it as full-blown aggressiveness. But
Muslims often point to these qualities as evidence of Islam’s vitality
and relevance in a supposedly secular age. To put it a bit differently,
this is why many Muslims like being Muslim.

Whether consciously done or not, to be unapologetically Muslim today is
to, in a way, show that other futures are possible, that the end of
history may in fact have more than one destination. If Islam has been —
and will continue to be — resistant to secularism, then the very
existence of practicing Muslims serves as a constant reminder of this
historical and religious divergence.

I realize that some of my fellow American Muslims will view such arguments
as inconvenient, portraying Islam in a not-so-positive light. But it is
not my job to make Islam look good, and it helps no one to maintain
fictions that make us feel better but don’t truly reflect the power and
relevance of religion.

In the West, the common response to the challenge of theological diversity
has been banal statements of religious “universality.” All too often,
interfaith dialogue, however well-intentioned, is about papering over what
makes us — or at least our beliefs — different. It is a tenet of our
American faith that we’re all basically the same and ultimately want the
same things. This is true in some ways, but not in every way.

The crisis of culture and identity — one that sees the rise of the
far-right and white nativism in our own country — makes it clear that
our differences and divides are real. We would all be better off
acknowledging — and addressing — those differences rather than
pretending they don’t exist.

Shadi Hamid is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and the author
of “Islamic Exceptionalism: How the Struggle Over Islam is Reshaping the

Back to top
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AVENUE VIET Forum Index » L'Avenue All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group