AVENUE VIET Forum Index AVENUE VIET
An Online Community
 
AlbumAlbum   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of the webmasters, administrators and moderators of this forum. Refer to the complete disclaimer.
RIP Pierre Boulez

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AVENUE VIET Forum Index » Music and Poetry House
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
vu



Joined: 30 Apr 2005
Posts: 2371
Location: L.A., California

PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 1:55 am    Post subject: RIP Pierre Boulez Reply with quote

https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/music/pierre-boulez-conductor-of-bracing-clarity-dies-at-90/2016/01/06/b1e9a82e-b474-11e5-a842-0feb51d1d124_story.html

The Washington Post
Pierre Boulez, conductor of bracing clarity, dies at 90
By Tim Page January 6 at 8:10 AM

Pierre Boulez, who began his career as a radical modernist composer
dedicated to overthrowing classical traditions and lived to become one of
the most revered and sought-after orchestral conductors in the world, died
Jan. 6 in Baden-Baden, Germany. He was 90.

His family announced the death to the Philharmonie Paris but did not
disclose a cause.

Mr. Boulez (pronounced boo-LEZZ) came to public attention as the leading
voice of postwar avant-garde music in France, an enfant terrible given to
making public suggestions such as “the most elegant way of solving the
opera problem would be to blow up the opera houses.”

Not only did he outlive that youthful fervor, he went on to conduct
Richard Wagner’s “Ring” Cycle at Bayreuth in Germany, that most
exalted — and most conservative — of operatic shrines, and enjoyed
long and fruitful artistic relationships with many of the world’s great
orchestras.

Throughout his life, however, he remained devoted to new and unusual
music. During his bracing tenure as music director of the New York
Philharmonic from 1971 to 1978, he led the orchestra through more
contemporary works than it had played since the 19th century.

He spoke of conducting in visual terms. “I conceive of a composition as
a kind of canvas, created to be respected, certainly, but also to be
transformed,” he told Helena Matheopoulos for her 1982 book “Maestro:
Encounters with Conductors of Today.”

His emphasis on clarity, economy and objectivity was prized by the
composers whose works he led. “What a refreshing change it is to hear a
piece done so that you can grasp how it is written,” the British
composer Peter Maxwell Davies told Matheopoulos.

Another French composer of an earlier and more conservative generation,
Darius Milhaud, paid Mr. Boulez what must be the ultimate compliment.
“He despises my music,” Milhaud once said, “but he conducts it
better than anyone.”

Mr. Boulez was also renowned for his catalogue of compositions, some of
which — the Sonatine for flute and piano (1946); the Piano Sonata No. 2
(1948); “Le Marteau sans Maitre” (1955) for alto and chamber ensemble,
and “Pli Selon Pli” (1962) for soprano and large orchestra — counted
among the most significant and influential works of their time.

The young Mr. Boulez referred to his music as “organized delirium,”
and the phrase, rather than an oxymoron, was telling and apt. Mr. Boulez
created a violent, glittering and emotional music that was, nevertheless,
always carefully controlled, anchored by a highly complicated master plan.

In later years, Mr. Boulez was by all accounts a gracious, soft-spoken and
self-effacing gentleman, much beloved by the musicians he worked with. In
his composition and his conducting — which he managed with the brisk
efficiency of a bank teller giving change — he was the antithesis of the
romanticized stereotype of egoistic, heaven-storming musician.

“Perhaps I can explain it best by an old Chinese story,” he said to
his biographer, the late Joan Peyser. “A painter drew a landscape so
beautifully that he entered the picture and disappeared. For me, that is
the definition of a great work — a landscape painted so well that the
artist disappears in it.”

Pierre Boulez was born in Montbrison, France, on March 26, 1925. Although
he sang in the choir of his Catholic school and was a skilled pianist, he
originally planned to devote his career to engineering and mathematics.

Instead, he entered the Paris Conservatory in 1942 and began studies with
Olivier Messiaen, who became his principal teacher. He graduated in 1945
at the top of his class, and by the time he was 25, he was already
accepted as one of the brightest, fiercest — and most controversial —
musical spirits in postwar Europe.

To many artists and intellectuals, World War II had seemed an absolute
conclusion to “Old World” traditions, and the early Boulez was prone
to sociocultural positions that were hardly less radical than his music.

For example, when the composer Arnold Schoenberg died in 1951, Mr. Boulez
published a withering obituary dismissing most of the older man’s later
work. It was titled “Schoenberg est mort!” (“Schoenberg is dead!”)

Mr. Boulez began his conducting career with a series of Parisian concerts
he organized in the mid-1950s, titled “Domaine Musical” and devoted
mainly to avant-garde music. Starting off conducting his own work, he
moved gradually into the standard repertory and made his American debut in
1964 with the Cleveland Orchestra; he would remain closely associated with
the ensemble until his death.

By the time he agreed to take the New York Philharmonic position, he was
recognized as one of the leading conductors of his time, a stature
confirmed with clear, cool and revelatory recordings of works by Claude
Debussy, Hector Berlioz, Igor Stravinsky and Bela Bartok.

“He built programs and seasons around themes that connected 18th and
19th century music with the 20th,” Los Angeles Times music critic Mark
Swed wrote in 2010. “He expanded his audience by holding avant-garde
‘rug’ concerts in informal settings downtown to attract the young and
unstuffy.”

Nevertheless, he came in for much criticism for what was perceived as his
aloofness. The New York Times Magazine published a profile of Mr. Boulez
in 1973; it was titled “The Iceberg Conducteth.”

His tastes were strict. “I hate Tchaikovsky, and I will not conduct
him,” he said during his tenure at the Philharmonic. Still, he insisted
that he was not a “fascist”: “If the audience wants him, it can have
him.” He mellowed as he grew older, once saying that he now
“enjoyed” listening to composers such as Tchaikovsky and Sibelius but
still did not want to conduct them.

After he left New York in the late 1970s, the French government created
the Paris-based Institut de Recherche et Coordination Acoustique/Musique
(IRCAM), a sort of musical “think tank” and acoustical laboratory, to
his specifications. He served as its director for the next two decades. In
later years, he appeared mostly with the Chicago and Cleveland orchestras
in the United States and the Vienna and Berlin philharmonics in Europe.

Mr. Boulez kept his private life resolutely private, with no acknowledged
romantic relationship of any sort. Survivors could not immediately be
confirmed.

His recordings include Wagner’s 16-hour “Ring des Nibelungen” (which
was also filmed for television); large works by Berlioz and Mahler, and a
great deal of the music of Schoenberg, despite his early dismissal.

Some of Mr. Boulez’s less-predictable repertory choices included works
by Anton Bruckner, Richard Strauss and some orchestral music by the rock
musician and satirist Frank Zappa. Mr. Boulez made the first complete
recording of Alban Berg’s opera “Lulu” and recorded the complete
music of the Austrian composer Anton Webern twice over the course of three
decades.

Mr. Boulez always considered himself primarily a composer, although his
work tapered off sharply after he began to devote more time to conducting.
His later pieces include “Eclat” (1965) for chamber orchestra;
“Domaines” for clarinet solo or with 21 instruments (1968);
“Repons” (1985); and a Piano Sonata No. 3, which was begun in the
1950s and has yet to be completed (portions of the score have been
published and performed).

Perhaps his most telling title belongs to a work for chamber ensemble that
was completed in 1973. It was titled “. . .explosante/fixe” —
fixed explosion — an image that neatly summed up Mr. Boulez’s
compositional ideal.

Tim Page is a former classical music critic at The Washington Post
_________________
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message
murat



Joined: 13 Dec 2005
Posts: 1396
Location: New York

PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 2:51 am    Post subject: 2016 begins ill for show biz! Reply with quote

First Michel Delpech, then actor Michel Galabru, now Pierre Boulez! Crying or Very sad

https://fr.news.yahoo.com/pierre-boulez-lhomme-pr%C3%A9f%C3%A9rait-pol%C3%A9mique-%C3%A0-politesse-140623221.html
_________________
Roule, tambour d'Arcole!!
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AVENUE VIET Forum Index » Music and Poetry House All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group